Matchpoints, field varies from eternal beginner to advanced, most play some sort of English Acol. These opps are about average.
I didn't think too much about it - just led a small heart to the king. When it lost I was one down for 29% of the matchpoints.
Afterwards I thought about if there was another option. Starting with a small spade from dummy. If South splits, I can repeat the spade finesse for the 9th trick. If she doesn't split, I can always be back to the heart suit.
It would give me another 11.5% chance on top of the 50% chance that the ♥A is onside. But maybe it is not such a good idea:
- If S has a sec ♠ honour and I play her for splitting, I will be down even with ♥A onside.
- If S hasn't got ♠KQ (or decides not to split but I play her for splitting), I could be two or maybe three down instead of one.
- There is a small chance that opps will do something silly and let me make the contract even if ♥A is with South. Not a big chance but a bit more than zero percent.
- If S had ♠KQTxx plus ♥A she might have bid over my partner's Stayman.
It is probably crucial here how many MPs +400, -50, -100 and -150 will score. Probably nobody will open 1NT so the auction could easily become contested at other tables, and then all kind of things could happen. Or somebody might chose to open 1♣ and rebid 1NT, thereby not inhibiting a spade lead.
What do you think? Would it have been obvious to take the extra chance with the spades if it had been IMPs?