BBO Discussion Forums: Preempted by partner - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Preempted by partner He's known to be "light" with his preempts

#1 User is offline   BunnyGo 

  • Lamentable Bunny
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,505
  • Joined: 2008-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 2011-August-31, 07:56

Your partner preempts in first seat, naturally you have a monster hand. Now what?



You're playing a Meckwell version of Ogust where the 3 response says it was a 5 card preempt. You've agreed that 4 is a modified key card. It's undiscussed what Ace ask you have available *after* an Ogust bid (suggestions are welcome).

How do you bid this hand?

Spoiler


If you have other systems here, I'd be interested in hearing those if you prefer.
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34

Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
0

#2 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2011-August-31, 08:15

I like playing 4C as modified keycards also after the Ogust reply.

After either ask it seems obvious to bid 4S. If partner has a 4-card minor we likely have a slam in that minor but there's no way to find out and 4S may be high enough.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#3 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-August-31, 08:24

Given that you don't have clear follow-up agreements to Ogust, I would just bid 4. If partner has a keycard and Q, then slam is quite unlikely to be worse than needing a 3-2 break and avoiding a heart lead, and it could be laydown after you avoid the ruff at trick 2.
Still, having Ogust+keycard available would be much better, opposite a bad spade suit you don't want to be in slam unless partner has two aces.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#4 User is offline   jdeegan 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,427
  • Joined: 2005-August-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Economics
    Finance
    Bridge bidding theory
    Cooking
    Downhill skiing

Posted 2011-August-31, 09:48

:P 2NT
Pard needs almost the magic hand for six. Might as well see if he thinks he has it.
0

#5 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,164
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2011-August-31, 10:06

View Postjdeegan, on 2011-August-31, 09:48, said:

:P 2NT
Pard needs almost the magic hand for six. Might as well see if he thinks he has it.

Agree with the bid, not sure about the comment, AQxxxx and a stiff heart or only 4 cards between hearts and clubs gives you decent chances, hardly magic, ditto A and QJxxxx.

The kicker may be where partner has something revolting like Qxxxxx, Q10, 10, Jxxx where 3N is solid but 4 is not guaranteed.
0

#6 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,417
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2011-August-31, 11:40

View Postcherdano, on 2011-August-31, 08:24, said:

Given that you don't have clear follow-up agreements to Ogust, I would just bid 4. If partner has a keycard and Q, then slam is quite unlikely to be worse than needing a 3-2 break and avoiding a heart lead, and it could be laydown after you avoid the ruff at trick 2.
If they're playing that version of Ogust, I think (especially white-on-red first seat) what you mean is "worse than needing a 3-*3* break and avoiding a heart lead"...

Of course, if they're playing the (to my mind silly, but my partners insist) rule where a 5-card suit must be a max (good suit, outside card, not 5-3-3-2), then you're probably back in the game. But I'd expect a crappy 5-carder here more often than A QJxxxx or AQxxxx ...
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#7 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-August-31, 12:29

I would give up after he showed the worst and 6 spades.
0

#8 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-August-31, 14:04

View Postmycroft, on 2011-August-31, 11:40, said:

If they're playing that version of Ogust, I think (especially white-on-red first seat) what you mean is "worse than needing a 3-*3* break and avoiding a heart lead"...

Good point, I didn't read that part. If partner has 5 spades though, I really fancy playing slam in his minor side suit (and I really hope he cannot be 5332).
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#9 User is offline   Foxx 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 338
  • Joined: 2003-February-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:La Jolla, California
  • Interests:Being quick, brown, and foxy; Jumping over lazy dogs

Posted 2011-August-31, 16:02

Ask for key cards ASAP. With these methods, we can stop in 4 if North shows one key card without the trump queen, and I just have to hope partner doesn't have the A and QJ10xxx.

We're putting down 6-7 tricks, the five level should be safe opposite anything remotely resembling a 2 bid.
0

#10 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-August-31, 17:16

View PostBunnyGo, on 2011-August-31, 07:56, said:

Your partner preempts in first seat, naturally you have a monster hand. Now what?



If you have other systems here, I'd be interested in hearing those if you prefer.


Well, I have this response scheme. It's not optimal, but copes ok with systematic 5-card preempts.

2x 2NT
3C = forget it. I have a BAD hand.
3D = so-so hand, 5 cards
3H = so-so, 6 cards
3S = max hand, 5 cards
3NT= cool hand, 6 cards. Could have opened 1x.

Using this method I'd just wheel-off the relay and bid on opposite a max response. Using your methods I'm not sure what to do. Maybe I'd just ask the nr. of cards and sign-off in 3NT if pard has only 5 cards.
0

#11 User is offline   BunnyGo 

  • Lamentable Bunny
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,505
  • Joined: 2008-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 2011-September-01, 02:48

Thanks for the comments. Here's the whole hand. We've now agreed that 4 modified KC is still available after Ogust.


Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34

Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users