4NT after opening 2NT then Jacoby Transfers
#21
Posted 2020-April-25, 13:47
I got a reply about why to flip-flop Texas as a slam invite with 2NT. In essence, the top level players in Italy play it that way and if I don't agree then I should phone Lauria
Thinking about it, I suspect it originated when superaccepts for 3-level transfers over 2NT were unheard of or strictly length related. In that case a responder with a single suit would have no way to invite to slam without forcing beyond game level unless Texas was invitational.
Thinking about it, I suspect it originated when superaccepts for 3-level transfers over 2NT were unheard of or strictly length related. In that case a responder with a single suit would have no way to invite to slam without forcing beyond game level unless Texas was invitational.
#24
Posted 2020-April-30, 12:10
arepo24, on 2020-April-30, 09:31, said:
I too wonder why 4 Clubs (Gerber) was never considered by anyone. What's the problem with that bid?
#1 4C is only Gerber, if responder bids it immediately after a 1NT / 2NT opening bid.
And there are a other usages for a 4C response to NT opening bids than Gerber.
#2 If responder is strong enough to set a major suit and after setting trumps, the common
approach is going via Texas Transfers.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#25
Posted 2020-May-02, 07:37
P_Marlowe, on 2020-April-30, 12:10, said:
#1 4C is only Gerber, if responder bids it immediately after a 1NT / 2NT opening bid.
And there are a other usages for a 4C response to NT opening bids than Gerber.
#2 If responder is strong enough to set a major suit and after setting trumps, the common
approach is going via Texas Transfers.
And there are a other usages for a 4C response to NT opening bids than Gerber.
#2 If responder is strong enough to set a major suit and after setting trumps, the common
approach is going via Texas Transfers.
After 2NT opening and 3♦ transfer you can bid 4 ♠ as BW because the All other bids are natural.
#27
Posted 2020-May-18, 09:02
I would always break with 4-card support but not always with 3. If you transfer and partner bids a simple 3H, quantitative 4NT does not rule out 6H. Partner can still bid 6H with maximum, 3 card support and a doubleton outside.
#28
Posted 2020-May-18, 10:56
nullve, on 2020-April-25, 13:48, said:
Non-forcing RKC (I said it!)
LOL it is perfectly valid. If you are accepting, show aces along the way and now you can stop in 5NT if necessary.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein