BBO Discussion Forums: Deciding to use HSGT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Deciding to use HSGT

#1 User is offline   jerdonald 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 124
  • Joined: 2011-July-27

Posted 2015-December-12, 20:11

BBO forum,
Most definitions of HSGT suggest 15+ HCP by the major opener
but don't mention anything about favorable distribution.

If opener has the minimum and responder bids 2M with only 6 points
3M may not make.

Should distribution be part of the opener's decision to use HSGT
with the minimum?

Jerry
0

#2 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2015-December-12, 21:43

I would not use a HSGT with 9 HCP even if I had a very nice distribution.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#3 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-December-13, 03:06

You should always take distribution into account when evaluating the strength of your hand. But with extreme distributions - say, 5-5 or 6-4, it may often be better just to jump to 4M. If 4M goes down, often the opponents would have been able to make a contract at the 4-level (or 3S if you are playing in hearts). Plus it will be harder to defend if you don't tell opponents about your shape. Hence even playing a 25% game might be with the odds.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#4 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-December-13, 11:41

View Postcherdano, on 2015-December-13, 03:06, said:

But with extreme distributions - say, 5-5 or 6-4, it may often be better just to jump to 4M.


Information leak plays a role in helping the defense too.

On a variety of hands, especially when needing help in 1 of 2 suits we started playing that after a major is raised, 2nt asks you to bid suits you would accept a hsgt on (high card wise) up the line. Doesn't sell the opening lead very often and tells them nothing they won't see when the dummy hits.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#5 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2015-December-14, 07:55

Most definitions of HSGT suggest 15+ HCP by the major opener but don't mention anything about favorable distribution. Should distribution be part of the opener's decision to use HSGT with the minimum?   


Of course,the 15+hcp hand means that you have extra values in the hand and have ability to make HSGT,but you must take distribution and suits quality (especially trumph quality) into account.

  If opener has the minimum and responder bids 2M with only 6 points 3M may not make.

If opener really can't make 3M ,I think responder should be responsible for some of the blame.
For example :
Responder hold :XXX, Axxx,Qxx, xxx
After opening 1,responder should bid forcing 1nt instead of 2 ,even we usually say 2M=6-9hcp (or 6-10hcp).
I think 2M responding should promise that responder can afford HSGT by opener.






0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users