BBO Discussion Forums: Law 31B needs comma moved - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Law 31B needs comma moved Law 31B needs comma moved

#1 User is offline   BudH 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 2004-April-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Bend, Indiana, USA
  • Interests:Operations Supervisor/Technical Advisor at nuclear power plant, soccer and basketball referee for more than 25 years; GLM; Ex-Head (Game) Director at South Bend (Indiana) Bridge Club; avid student of bridge law and game movements

Posted 2015-March-09, 07:35

Law 31B (Bid Out of Rotation – Partner’s or LHO’s Turn) presently says the following:

“When the offender has bid at his partner’s turn to call or at his LHO’s turn to call, if the offender has not previously called, offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call...”

The comma after the second occurrence of "call" needs to be moved to before the FIRST occurrence of the word "call" so that it will read as follow:

“When the offender has bid at his partner’s turn to call, or at his LHO’s turn to call if the offender has not previously called, offender’s partner must pass whenever it is his turn to call...”

This would then make it clear Law 31B is to be used in the following two situations:

(1) when it is partner's turn to call, OR
(2) when it is LHO's turn to call and he has not previously called (which would normally mean LHO is dealer and about to make the first call of the auction)

Bud Hinckley
South Bend, Indiana, USA (ACBL)
0

#2 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2015-March-09, 07:43

View PostBudH, on 2015-March-09, 07:35, said:

Law 31B (Bid Out of Rotation – Partner’s or LHO’s Turn) presently says the following:

Not according to my copy, which has three commas in it.

Quote

When the offender has bid at his partner’s turn to call, or at his LHO’s turn to call, if the offender has not previously called, offender’s partner must [...]

0

#3 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2015-March-09, 07:56

View Postcampboy, on 2015-March-09, 07:43, said:

Not according to my copy, which has three commas in it.

Nevertheless, Bud's recommendation is better.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#4 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,594
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-March-09, 09:24

Why do you think this is the intent of the law? Why should the condition that it be the first round of the auction only be applicable when it's done at LHO's turn, not partner's turn?

#5 User is offline   jnichols 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: 2006-May-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Carmel, IN, USA

Posted 2015-March-09, 09:41

View Postbarmar, on 2015-March-09, 09:24, said:

Why do you think this is the intent of the law? Why should the condition that it be the first round of the auction only be applicable when it's done at LHO's turn, not partner's turn?

If the player calls at LHO's turn and the player has already called then it is treated as a change of call, not a call out of turn.
John S. Nichols - Director & Webmaster
Indianapolis Bridge Center
0

#6 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,594
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-March-09, 09:58

Silly me, I was somehow thinking that there could be an entire round of bidding between the offender's previous call and his call at LHO's turn. But LHO's turn can't happen until the offender has called again. What I was thinking can only apply to calling at RHO's turn.

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users