(3D)-(5D), and I have game in hand
#1
Posted 2014-March-07, 23:39
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#2
Posted 2014-March-08, 00:00
Really, what else is there?
Double then 5♠ is better in theory, but only if partner were to bid 5♥, which is improbable. In real life, he will pass far more often than he will bid. Slam is just way too optimistic.
#3
Posted 2014-March-08, 00:22
#4
Posted 2014-March-08, 02:00
#5
Posted 2014-March-08, 03:59
Also, when we are going down because of a club loser, RHO won't know that, so he may save anyway. That won't happen that often, but if he has a source of tricks in hearts 7♣ may look cheap.
#6
Posted 2014-March-08, 04:30
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!), but Thats funny Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#7
Posted 2014-March-08, 05:39
IMPs it depends on whether the other table are likely to replicate the 3D-5D. For example I know one of my usual team-mates is a wimp and might not, thus allowing opps to exchange info and land in the right place (game or slam). Hence I think I have to try 6S just in case it's there (unless I was ahead in the match). But if team-mates will bid 3D-5D, it sounds right to take the 90+% plus in 5S.
ahydra
#8
Posted 2014-March-08, 09:34
Surely rho didn't bid 5♦ to make. I guess it's possible but a longshot and if it's on big red suits I can make slam anyway.
The slam will fetch opposite a (magic) few spades and the ♣T and partner is marked for more than that or rho would have passed 3♦. We may well be on for the unbiddable grand. In my younger days I would try 6♦ expecting a 6♥ response and then bid 6♠ trolling for a raise but I only torture partners in midnights now.
I was taught that if you can construct a suitable sub minimum for partner in under 10 seconds, bid it.
What is baby oil made of?
#9
Posted 2014-March-08, 18:59
ggwhiz, on 2014-March-08, 09:34, said:
Surely rho didn't bid 5♦ to make. I guess it's possible but a longshot and if it's on big red suits I can make slam anyway.
The slam will fetch opposite a (magic) few spades and the ♣T and partner is marked for more than that or rho would have passed 3♦. We may well be on for the unbiddable grand. In my younger days I would try 6♦ expecting a 6♥ response and then bid 6♠ trolling for a raise but I only torture partners in midnights now.
I was taught that if you can construct a suitable sub minimum for partner in under 10 seconds, bid it.
Why do you assume rho did not bid 5Dto make. Give her a S void and there are many hands on which a 5D bid is bid to make.
#10
Posted 2014-March-08, 19:59
If rho bid 5♦ to make with a spade void I fancy my chances even more - the heart ace and club King rate to be onside and partner rates to have spade length which I can use as entries.
I have a two loser hand, one opponent has shown weakness, both opponents have bid my void suit, one lost can be covered by an ordinary finesse through the likely stronger of the opponents hands.
To those who count the fourth club as a loser there are so many ways to cover that I am not worrying about it in the bidding: club King, club length, club shortage, 3-3 break, ditch on possible long hearts in dummy, diamond ace
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#11
Posted 2014-March-09, 07:05
does not and that is if I want to take a penalty x there is a great
chance I might get to x 6c and it is far less likely I will get to
x 7c. This tactical advantage appears to be insufficient however. If
for some reason rho bid 5d to make us going down 2 in 6s is not that
big of a deal compared with going down 1 in 5s especially if rho has
a spade void and lots of hearts. The funny thing about 6s is the very
conditions that allow 5d to make might be all we need to make 6s.
xxxxx xx xx Txx is really all I need to make 6s a pretty darn good shot.
The hog points out that it is unlikely p will ever raise 5s and I agree
with him but asking for xxxx(x) and the club T just does not seem like
too much to ask from partner given the probable huge fit the opps have
in diamonds.
6S for me.
#12
Posted 2014-March-09, 08:47
#13
Posted 2014-March-09, 09:46
I'd go 6♠
#14
Posted 2014-March-09, 13:09
mikeh, on 2014-March-08, 00:00, said:
Really, what else is there?
There is 6♠. That's my bid. Partner rates to have A♥ or K♣ about 56% of the time with no other information, and on the auction, I rate it closer to 2/3 of the time. And even if he has neither, he might be able to save us with long hearts QJ and a late spade entry, or a club ruffing value.
#15
Posted 2014-March-09, 15:15
the hog, on 2014-March-08, 18:59, said:
And that gives partner 4+ spades making 6♠ a heavy favorite.
What is baby oil made of?
#16
Posted 2014-March-09, 22:09
#17
Posted 2014-March-10, 00:14
lariyol, on 2014-March-09, 22:09, said:
You must be a world class card holder. With the first three hands, my partner would pull out the 4♠ bidding card and cross their fingers with the 4th hand .
#18
Posted 2014-March-11, 22:43
What junk!
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#19
Posted 2014-March-12, 00:18
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#20
Posted 2014-March-12, 02:13
chasetb, on 2014-March-11, 22:43, said:
What junk!
No real surpise that it cannot make.
MrAce, why does MikeH chuck 13 imps? I assume that was sarcasm?