ATB bad contract
#3
Posted 2013-July-13, 07:18
3♣ has a lot of strikes against it - 5-card suit, bad pips, good defence, poor playing strength, terrible spade holding, shortage in other major.
3NT is is slightly less bad - no honour in clubs, wrong spade holding, minimum values. To be fair, West was already out of winning options. Sometimes 3NT is not much worse a contract than 3♣ and it is rarely doubled.
#4
Posted 2013-July-13, 07:51
Passing 2♠ or 3♣ both carry risk. The only clue is East has heart shortness and spade length and partner didn't take any action when he is odds on short in spades and long in hearts and didn't bid, which might suggest the best option is to pass two spades in the balancing seat. So if I were to assign any blame, it would have to be primarily to East.
#5
Posted 2013-July-13, 09:02
#7
Posted 2013-July-13, 11:13
#8
Posted 2013-July-13, 15:07
jxx of spades and x of hearts....partner obviously has a bag of crap if he can't bid when you have those.
#9
Posted 2013-July-13, 17:16
wank, on 2013-July-13, 15:07, said:
Or we want to get them down/try defending at 2♠.
3NT is also a little too much. Why didn't West bid 3♥? Not that it would get them to a much better spot but 3NT is too one-sided. I'd say East 75, West 25.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#10
Posted 2013-July-14, 17:37
What is baby oil made of?
#11
Posted 2013-July-15, 17:40
That being said, West has no business bidding 3 NT over the 3 ♣ bid.
#12
Posted 2013-July-15, 18:03
#13
Posted 2013-July-15, 19:12
TL;DR, I like to bid GAME!
Balancing with 3C is bad obviously.
#14
Posted 2013-July-15, 20:41
#15
Posted 2013-July-15, 21:44
#16
Posted 2013-July-16, 07:27
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#17
Posted 2013-July-17, 02:58