BBO Discussion Forums: your every day's situation - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

your every day's situation

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-January-19, 16:07

Maybe erratic is a better description that wide ranging for the played in question.
0

#2 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2013-January-19, 16:30

4 should have play. 6 should not. Seems like an easy 4 bid.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
1

#3 User is offline   rduran1216 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 815
  • Joined: 2009-August-31

Posted 2013-January-19, 16:37

actually i think 6S will have play often, and since its here on the forums its guarenteed to have play

109xxxxx
Kxx
Axx
-

109xxxxx
-
xxxx
Ax

all kinds of permutations do. But bidding anything other than 4S is absurd
Aaron Jones Unit 557

www.longbeachbridge.com
0

#4 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,664
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2013-January-19, 17:24

View PostFluffy, on 2013-January-19, 16:07, said:

Maybe erratic is a better description that wide ranging for the played in question.


The more wide ranging (erratic) a bid is the less likely p will ever know what to do. This hand is a
perfect example where anything you decide to do is a complete guess and any further competitive
bidding that occurs will leave you with a complete guess.

MP 4S who knows what will happen but the opps will be guessing as much as you are and there
is little sense in assuring your side a poor result.

IMPS 5S opps can make anywhere btn 3 and 7 and i have not a clue where. It seems that
taking out some insurance with a further blocking bid is best overall. 4S is possilee but we will
be opening a can of worms if the opps compete further possibly making it easier for them to
bid slam.
0

#5 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2013-January-19, 17:47

4. 6 is a two outer.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#6 User is offline   pigpenz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,554
  • Joined: 2005-April-25

Posted 2013-January-19, 19:34

4 expecting way too much from partner for six
0

#7 User is offline   Lord Molyb 

  • Slightly less bad player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 964
  • Joined: 2012-October-16
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bridge

Posted 2013-January-19, 22:07

But guys! Partner could have two outside aces! It's not anything you can simply ignore! :D

Spoiler

Become yourself.
0

#8 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-January-20, 01:09

This is more like a story tale than really a problem, don't expect any of us will find AKQJ support for partner's 3 level preempt anytime soon. Partner had AKA
0

#9 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2013-January-20, 09:53

View PostFluffy, on 2013-January-20, 01:09, said:

Partner had AKA

I think your alternative description is more accurate than the original "wide ranging".

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#10 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2013-January-20, 09:56

View PostFluffy, on 2013-January-20, 01:09, said:

This is more like a story tale than really a problem, don't expect any of us will find AKQJ support for partner's 3 level preempt anytime soon. Partner had AKA

If partner holds those cards then 4 is still the best contract. With this partner I expect you will lose a diamond and a trump. ;)

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users