BBO Discussion Forums: Kaplan-Sheinwold question - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Kaplan-Sheinwold question

#1 User is offline   S2000magic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 439
  • Joined: 2011-November-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yorba Linda, CA
  • Interests:magic, horseback riding, hiking, camping, F1 racing, bridge, mathematics, finance, teaching

Posted 2012-May-28, 14:04

These hands look troublesome to me; I'd appreciate any advice from K-S experts:

Opener:
7
A K 5 2
A Q 8 2
10 5 4 2

Responder:
9 8 6 5
Q J
J 10 6
A K J 8

The first round's easy:

1 - 1

Then what?

Opener's 2 rebid is forcing (strong, like a reverse) and promises a rebid, which seems a bit extravagent; is 2 the systemic rebid? If opener rebids 2, does responder bid 3, 2NT, something else?

Thanks in advance.
BCIII

"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."

Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.
0

#2 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2012-May-28, 14:21

from Kaplan-Sheinwold Updated...

"1N opening has been known on specifically 1-4-4-4 pattern, with spade honor, because of rebidding problems, but 1H is usually preferable if hearts are decent."

I suppose you would open that 1H. Not sure what you would do with x Jxxx Axxx AKQx
0

#3 User is offline   S2000magic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 439
  • Joined: 2011-November-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yorba Linda, CA
  • Interests:magic, horseback riding, hiking, camping, F1 racing, bridge, mathematics, finance, teaching

Posted 2012-May-28, 15:35

Thanks. On reflection, that sounds like the best solution for the given hand.

Now I just have to convince my partner, who dislikes any of the 4-card major possibilities in K-S.

As for your example hand, all I can say is that you're mean. ;) Probably 1, then 2.
BCIII

"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."

Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.
0

#4 User is offline   Flem72 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 506
  • Joined: 2011-March-04

Posted 2012-May-29, 08:08

WNT structures benefit from some form of mini-Roman. You are worried about 1-4-4-4 and 4-4-4-1. I plya this way with my K-Sish partners:

Only with stiff in black suit; AK & A = 12.

P,2H = to play

2S = to play with 6+; O may raise with stiff C and max

2N = starts all inv or potentially strong sequences, asks stiff and strength by steps: 3C = C, 12-13; 3D = S, 12-13; 3H = C, 13-14; 3S = S, 13-14.
Now: Any 3-level call is to play; R's 4C or 4D is to play
Games are to play, even 4S or 5C.
4N = RKCB for non-stiff black suit (i.e., after 3C or 3H, for S; after 3D or 3S, for C). (NOTE: This works also if you hold a solid or one or ½ loser 6+ suit in the stiff.).

3C = to play with 6+; O may raise with stiff S and max
3D = to play, either preemptive or to make
3H = to play, either preemptive or to make
3S = RKCB for H
3N = to-play
4C = RKCB for D
4,5D = to play, either preemptive or to make
4H = to play, either preemptive or to make

In ACBL, all non-forcing responses after the 2D opener are alertable.


1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users