OK, with Nigel at the helm it's about 70%.
Should this be bid?
#21
Posted 2012-March-10, 02:40
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#22
Posted 2012-March-10, 11:01
Excellent post by gnasher even if he was wrong about 10 %. If even the great kenrexford cannot bid slam I don't know who can
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#23
Posted 2012-March-11, 01:31
han, on 2012-March-09, 09:35, said:
Agree with Gnasher.
♥ ♥ ♥
Yes, I agree tat you agree with Gnasher.
Is he your brother ?
♥ ♥ ♥
♥Bob Herreman ♥
#24
Posted 2012-March-11, 09:16
Huh... the 4♦ be cannot be anything than a heart cue.
With clubs you bid 4/5♣.
With diamonds you bid 3NT.
With 3 spades you bid 3♠.
So...
4♦ = hearts, obviously.
With clubs you bid 4/5♣.
With diamonds you bid 3NT.
With 3 spades you bid 3♠.
So...
4♦ = hearts, obviously.