Your call now? Teams of eight
#2
Posted 2011-June-19, 04:48
#3
Posted 2011-June-19, 05:43
#4
Posted 2011-June-19, 06:19
Onedown, on 2011-June-19, 05:43, said:
1) 3♦ overcall seems obvious. Singleton heart, w/r, 6 card suit to the AK and an opening hand, passing 2♥ strikes me as bizarre, what is this about a gun to our head?
I would never pass partner's takeout double with this hand, pass deserves to score -990.
If I accidentally pulled out the pass card without noticing and found myself on lead to 4♥X I would lead a top diamond instead of the ♠K.
#5
Posted 2011-June-19, 07:07
655321, on 2011-June-19, 06:19, said:
I would never pass partner's takeout double with this hand, pass deserves to score -990.
If I accidentally pulled out the pass card without noticing and found myself on lead to 4♥X I would lead a top diamond instead of the ♠K.
Why is this a t/o double? Opponents often jump to 4♥ after 2♥ with only two hearts. t/o to what? We already announced that our suit is diamonds.
#6
Posted 2011-June-19, 07:43
jogs, on 2011-June-19, 07:07, said:
This discussion was the reason I posted this hand (and the spectacular outcome, which I'll post later!)
In spite of playing together about once a month for a few years, I don't think we've really hammered out the details of these doubles. Our cards says "Level to which negative doubles apply: 4D (higher doubles show cards)".
London UK
#7
Posted 2011-June-19, 08:11
#8
Posted 2011-June-19, 09:35
But I don't quite understand why leading the ♠K is bad; partner should have values in spades, a ruff is not neccessarily ruled out though less likely probably. Neither do I understand why is Pass not an option (after 3♦ and here after partner's double); I think there are pairs who overcall really strong in direct position so their reopenings are...more daring.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#9
Posted 2011-June-19, 10:00
#10
Posted 2011-June-19, 10:02
jogs, on 2011-June-19, 07:07, said:
This is like saying that since some people overcall bad five card suits, the auction 1♥ (2♣) X should be penalty, not negative, since opener already announced his suit was hearts.
#11
Posted 2011-June-19, 11:11
Totally obvious 3♦ overcall. LOL @ anything else in the A/E.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#12
Posted 2011-June-19, 13:34
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#13
Posted 2011-June-19, 13:54
#14
Posted 2011-June-20, 01:18
I suppose in retrospect I was guilty of making a "Queen of Hearts" double - hoping it would mean what I wanted it to mean on this hand. I thought I was asking partner to pass unless his hand was quite unusual, whereas he thought I was asking him to bid.
North must have thought all his Christmases had come at once - how often do you have a trump stack of AKQTxx to double a five-level contract?!
We had a great group of team-mates who were amused rather than annoyed when we scored up with a -1700, and we still managed to win both the match and the whole event.
I'm not sure that I would have found the winning action in any case, since I would have been tempted to bid 4♠ if I thought the alternative was to pass. It does seem a shame that we aren't able to take the +500 that's there.
London UK
#15
Posted 2011-June-20, 02:24
#16
Posted 2011-June-20, 06:53
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2011-June-20, 07:02
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#18
Posted 2011-June-22, 05:47
Most important lesson out of this is to make good agreements about Doubles. This is one area which I used to underestimate. A simple Dbl can be an easy way to victory, but it can also ruin one's game if not applied correctly or if there's a misunderstanding. It's better to have a bad agreement than no agreement at all.
#19
Posted 2011-June-22, 11:30
Free, on 2011-June-22, 05:47, said:
Most important lesson out of this is to make good agreements about Doubles. This is one area which I used to underestimate. A simple Dbl can be an easy way to victory, but it can also ruin one's game if not applied correctly or if there's a misunderstanding. It's better to have a bad agreement than no agreement at all.
Free, u started to talk like Lurpoa lately (just a joke m8 )
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#20
Posted 2011-June-22, 13:42
mtvesuvius, on 2011-June-19, 10:02, said:
You see no difference in asking pard to bid another suit on the two level and asking pard to bid another suit on the five level?
whereagles, on 2011-June-20, 02:24, said:
Holding that pattern(4234), why would you think there are 21 tricks on this board? That's why the pass is clear-cut.
The double should be cards, not penalty or t/o.