Euro 2008 thread
#61
Posted 2008-June-13, 11:06
#62
Posted 2008-June-13, 12:13
George Carlin
#63
Posted 2008-June-13, 14:41

#64
Posted 2008-June-13, 15:39

- hrothgar
#65
Posted 2008-June-13, 15:40
btw what do you think about the Holland-Romania match? in theory the Romanians may seem like easier opposition for the semis than either world championship finalist, so they may not really want to get any points of the last round.
George Carlin
#66
Posted 2008-June-13, 16:07
They were talking on Dutch tv about letting Romania win so that France and Italy are out. The tv people all thought that was a great idea and the soccer people all thought it was a horrible idea.
Clearly the players with small injuries will not play and that's quite a few. But I think that the players that do play will try to play as well as they can.
My own thought is that right now Spain seems more dangerous than either Italy or France so it isn't so clear that having a weaker team to be second in the group is good for the Netherlands. It also isn't really clear yet if Romania is actually considerably weaker.
- hrothgar
#67
Posted 2008-June-14, 02:38
Rik (living in "Someone else")
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!), but Thats funny Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#68
Posted 2008-June-14, 04:19
FrancesHinden, on Jun 8 2008, 09:16 AM, said:
I know this doesn't happen in practice, because you do hear about bookmakers making big losses when something extraordinary happens but I think it's generally true.
(I've made all of this post up, I don't have any actual knowledge- but it convinced me!)
This isn't actually right, at least for many North American and Central American bookies. While they do move lines in response to action and try not to be hugely over balanced they will often take positions. If they know their fairly accurate true odds estimate and know that the public is over betting one side they will stay closer to their estimated true odds instead of staying at the balanced point.
It was interesting that the Luftansa folks stopped general service and movies to announce the score several times on my flight back to the US from Germany during the Croatia-Germany game.
#69
Posted 2008-June-14, 06:46
Italy and France have produced lacklustre performances, and do not deserve to go through.
Times have really changed when the world cup finalists are going to battle it out to avoid getting knocked out in the first round of the Euro!
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#70
Posted 2008-June-14, 06:51
I'm wondering, what if Italy-France is a draw after like 89 minutes? Would they do something like this, literally or somehow unconsciously? Of course if Romania lose, a 1-1 draw is OK for Italy and so is a 0-0, as long as Romania lose by 4-0, but that's the only position a draw is good for either team.
George Carlin
#71
Posted 2008-June-14, 07:42
- hrothgar
#72
Posted 2008-June-15, 04:00
gwnn, on Jun 14 2008, 08:51 PM, said:
I'm wondering, what if Italy-France is a draw after like 89 minutes? Would they do something like this, literally or somehow unconsciously? Of course if Romania lose, a 1-1 draw is OK for Italy and so is a 0-0, as long as Romania lose by 4-0, but that's the only position a draw is good for either team.
LOL, that never happened to me last time! (I used to play chess too)
Doubt it though, France and Italy have too much bad blood between them. (Cf. Materazzi-Zidane and Gallas' recent comments)
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#73
Posted 2008-June-15, 12:38
Robert
#74
Posted 2008-June-15, 14:24
Not much going on....the Romanians score an "opportune" goal and the Italians seemed to kick (pun intended) their game into overdrive, had several good chances and then got a goal within 2 or 3 minutes. Then, back to not seeming to try. If they could score by "pressing" so easily, did they not have to try to win the game?
#75
Posted 2008-June-15, 14:56
?

Go Turkey

#76
Posted 2008-June-15, 15:00
Al_U_Card, on Jun 15 2008, 10:24 PM, said:
Not much going on....the Romanians score an "opportune" goal and the Italians seemed to kick (pun intended) their game into overdrive, had several good chances and then got a goal within 2 or 3 minutes. Then, back to not seeming to try. If they could score by "pressing" so easily, did they not have to try to win the game?
It was something about Romanian relaxation after a goal. It's a general phenomenon in most teams, but especially Eastern European teams. BTW Italy-Romania had actually a high rhythm. If you didn't enjoy it, I'm afraid this sport isn't for you

George Carlin
#77
Posted 2008-June-15, 17:03
goooooooooooooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllll


#78
Posted 2008-June-16, 03:16
cjames, on Jun 15 2008, 09:56 PM, said:
Not BBO as such but a Turkish tourney I played yesterday evening suddenly got flooded with tourney chat about footie. Has happened before but this time it was really amazing. Detailed reports about which players kicked the ball in what direction after how many minutes etc.
#79
Posted 2008-June-17, 14:43


George Carlin
#80
Posted 2008-June-18, 04:56
gwnn, on Jun 17 2008, 09:43 PM, said:


It was really in Dutch interests to lose to Romania, as that would have eliminated both France and Italy. Seems they couldn't quite manage it.