Posted 2005-September-07, 05:44
I like the idea of "leaving" options when clicking one's name as well. This would eliminate one problem that leads to abandoned hands, the faily common situation where a player announces "last hand" but, when the next hand is dealt immediately, takes a bid and says "oh, just one more" seeing a fun and interesting set of cards. Meanwhile partner, who hasn't been dealt anything nearly as fun, is gone already and the table has to sit and wait till the person with the great hand decides what to do.
Another possible solution to this problem is a suggestion I made quite a while ago, that of allowing a host to reserve a seat for a replacement player while it is still occupied by a player who has announced he is leaving. This would really help facilitate a smooth transition between players. If it could be implemented in conjuction with "leaving options" then the seat could be reserved for a replacement player even a few hands in advance, not actually opening up until the current player clicks on his seat. If the desired replacement player is kibitzing the table, or sitting in the lobby - even playing at another table - the system could send a message (a seat has been reserved for you at xx table, would you like to sit) and refrain from redealing until the seat is occupied. Perhaps the system could even clear the reservation if the player declines to sit.
I have no issue with the "boot and bail" policy - there are certainly people who do both on an abusive level and that needs to be addressed. But I also think that, instead of just implementing punitive measures, addressing ways to smooth player transitions at table, to increase the liklihood that a pick-up partnership will be reasonably well matched, and that a table will attract the correct level of player, would go a long way towards eliminating the underlying problem.
Julie