BBO Discussion Forums: and another slam - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

and another slam

#1 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,709
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 09:12



If you opt for checkback (2) you will hear 2
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
0

#2 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,697
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 09:54

View Postjillybean, on 2025-November-09, 09:12, said:



If you opt for checkback (2) you will hear 2


Does the 2H answer says anything about spade, and strength?
I usually play, that 2H denies 3 spades, showes 4 hearts and min.
If you know about the 4th heart, you know, you dont have a club fit,
4441 is possible, but lets ignore this, and maybe your rebid is 2C,
and not 1NT.
If in addition you also dont have a spade fit, and face a min, I would
bid 3NT and be done with the hand.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#3 User is offline   apollo1201 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,186
  • Joined: 2014-June-01

Posted Yesterday, 10:31

Checking back is normal. At least the lead in S contracts goes to all our K.

Not sure what 2H says about S, but we realize that the hands might not mesh too well, and this is a good but not great 19.

It could be time to chicken out and bid 3NT.

At MP it is probably wiser, at IMP we can try 3C if forcing (maybe partner bids S with Kx but it is not clear where we are heading to.
0

#4 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,495
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted Yesterday, 13:49

4NT
0

#5 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,015
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Yesterday, 16:05

You didn't explain 1 which is relevant.
In any case I consider XYZ the modern standard in this situation.
I would bid 2 (game force without direction), obviously hoping to hear 2 (3 card support), which I raise.
0

#6 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,709
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 17:14

View PostP_Marlowe, on 2025-November-09, 09:54, said:

Does the 2H answer says anything about spade, and strength?
I usually play, that 2H denies 3 spades, showes 4 hearts and min.
If you know about the 4th heart, you know, you dont have a club fit,
4441 is possible, but lets ignore this, and maybe your rebid is 2C,
and not 1NT.
If in addition you also dont have a spade fit, and face a min, I would
bid 3NT and be done with the hand.

The method I am familiar with is that 2H shows 4 but does not deny 3S.
Another discussion we never have.

pescetom, 2D xyz is not available but 2C checkback is ok
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
0

#7 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,709
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 19:06

View Postmike777, on 2025-November-09, 13:49, said:

4NT

pass
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
0

#8 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,697
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted Today, 00:09

View Postjillybean, on 2025-November-09, 17:14, said:

The method I am familiar with is that 2H shows 4 but does not deny 3S.
Another discussion we never have.
<snip>


Both versions exists, although if responder has 4 hearts, he will have a
5 card spade suit.
And he will be more often interested in 3 spades, than in a 4 card heart
suit.

What about the min / max. information?

The name I know / use is also not checkback, it is NMF.

Anyway, if 3 spades are still possible, 3NT is premature.
You bid 3C over 2H.
This is forcing and natural, asks for add. information,
enabling opener to bid 3S, if he has 3 spades
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users