thepossum, on 2025-May-13, 04:05, said:
I'm sorry, with freak hands like this there is no "correct" bid. Anything could work, preempting on the 3/4/5/6 level? Sure could work out great. 1
♦ could too. 2
♣ might sometimes work. I've experimented with two-under preempts that could ALSO contain strong 3- loser 1/2 suiters. They work great and would be the perfect answer on this hand. BUT, a lot of strain on memory and quite complex combined with very low frequency of occurrence. So we decided to stop with it.
What I would say and jokingly tried to say is when you have an 8 card (or longer) that is the suit you ARE going to play, not the four card even if partner has a four card too. You'll never lose trump control no matter how bad they break. And it wouldn't be the first time the opponents let you make 3/4 clubs due to discarding the wrong cards after you ruff the
♠ lead and kept on pumping
♦. This is a one-suiter, not a two suiter.