The opponents play a style where 1♦ is 5+ or specific 4441's, so 1♣ may still have up to four diamonds in a balanced hand (and if balanced, it will be 12-14 or 18-19). Your call?
Not all two-suiters are easy to show
#1
Posted 2025-March-29, 05:39
The opponents play a style where 1♦ is 5+ or specific 4441's, so 1♣ may still have up to four diamonds in a balanced hand (and if balanced, it will be 12-14 or 18-19). Your call?
#2
Posted 2025-March-29, 05:44
1♠
and what Marlowe said below. Looking forward to the next bid
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#3
Posted 2025-March-29, 05:54
Thinking about this further 2♣ nominally as 4♠5♦ unlimited playing the Overcall Structure.
Now
2♦ preference
.. 2♥ weak 6♥
.. 2♠ 5♠6♣
.. or higher to force
2♥ ♠ preference
.. Pass 6♥ weak
.. a range of options to define strength/shape
#4
Posted 2025-March-29, 06:08
1♣-P-1♦-P
1♥-2♦ for example would be fine as would
1♣-P-1♥-P
2♥-3♥
#5
Posted 2025-March-29, 12:56
1S.
You need to find a fit.
If 2C is natural, you could try this, but it is unlikely, that you have discussed this,
and it may end the auction. Obv. the problem with 1S is, that you may have to find a further
bid, and the question is, if later club bids may show clubs, but lets survive this round.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#6
Posted 2025-March-29, 18:05
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#8
Posted 2025-March-29, 23:11
I am a bit afraid that if p preempts in a red suit, any action by us will be interpreted as support. So maybe safest just to bid spades.
It is also, of course, a bit risky to pass with such a strong hand.
#9
Posted Yesterday, 13:18
The continuation was not what I expected. Did you anticipate this? And what do you bid now?
#10
Posted Yesterday, 15:51
DavidKok, on 2025-April-01, 13:18, said:
The continuation was not what I expected. Did you anticipate this? And what do you bid now?
I did anticipate this. When I have a 65 hand and double, I'm in trouble when partner bids my shortage.
I consider this 55 and bid my spades.
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
"Bridge is a terrible game". blackshoe
#11
Posted Yesterday, 17:14
DavidKok, on 2025-April-01, 13:18, said:
The continuation was not what I expected. Did you anticipate this? And what do you bid now?
I knew this hand was just going to be a pain to bid.
Without getting into a long debate about what 1D promises, I am going to assume pard promises zero hcp at this point. 2D would have been roughly 8-11. Since I play ELC here I can't rebid one spade.
I will start with a cuebid of 2C, forcing, showing some random big hand at this point.
Partner please do your best to make some natural rebid, given you have about 0-7hcp and are forced to bid something, smile.
#12
Posted Yesterday, 18:49
As a Power X I play 1♦ as a negative or a weak 5+♦. Again I bid 1♠, but now this shows 4+ looking for a fit. Partner can now correct to 1N/2♦ or Pass.
#13
Posted Yesterday, 23:36
DavidKok, on 2025-April-01, 13:18, said:
The continuation was not what I expected. Did you anticipate this? And what do you bid now?
1S.
2C is now no longer a valid option, this is asking for a club stopper, or whatever.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)