BBO Discussion Forums: Is this a negative double? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is this a negative double? 2/1 ACBL

#1 User is offline   dickiegera 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 568
  • Joined: 2009-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 2021-July-04, 07:42

Would double by south be negative for spades or penalty

0

#2 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,896
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2021-July-04, 07:50

Penalties is standard I think, certainly is here
1

#3 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,190
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2021-July-04, 08:45

One of the features of a negative double is that responder must pass with a penalty double type hand while opener should reopen with a double when short in the overcalled suit (usually 2 or fewer) so responder can pass for penalties.

In this case with a 1N overcall there is no suit opener can be short in (can't be short in a NT). Double here is penalty.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Black Lives Matter. / "I need ammunition, not a ride." Zelensky
1

#4 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,835
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2021-July-04, 12:43

Playing it as negative caters to extremely low frequency hands while creating terrible results on most hands, where opener is minimum with no place to go.

Playing it as penalty, which is the norm, caters to far more hands, and usually far more lucrative hands
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#5 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,068
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2021-July-04, 16:11

Negative makes some sense if you play weak notrump ("partner, please pass if you have a balanced 15-count but bid your second suit if you have a 5431 11-count or so"), but in a strong notrump system there's no rationale for playing it as negative: opener would have no sensible way to respond to such a double with a 3532 12-count.

But even for weak notrump pairs, penalty is standard and probably best. This is frequently a no-fit auction, where overcaller's partner has a weak hand and nowhere to go, and South is in a good position to judge this: with any 9-count they know that NS has the majority of the points.

Besides, which hands would qualify for a negative double? Encouraging opener to bid again if opener has any 5431-shape would only be safe if responder has exactly 4144, but then it isn't safe in case opener has to rebid their 6-card hearts. Consider that E has shown at least one (often two) stoppers in hearts so a 6-1 fit is not great here. W knows their partner's defense values so is in a good position to double whatever North bids.

So penalty is 100% standard everywhere and clearly also the best agreement, although maybe you could experiment with non-penalty doubles under some special circumstances:
- At w/w at matchpoints if you play weak NT (and all 5M332 hands in range open 1NT)
- If you play Flannery and weak NT you could agree that the double shows both minors and heart tolerance
- If you play weak NT and have an intermediate 2 opening available you could agree that the double shows a 3-suited hand short hearts
- If you play weak NT and 4-card majors, you could play dbl as showing 3-card support
- If you play a strict canape system, maybe
- You could agree that the double shows some 1-suited hand (DONT) or two-suited (as in for example the Woolsey or Meyerson defenses to 1NT openings)
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#6 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,029
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2021-July-05, 02:32

Hi,

regardless what you play it, x showes values, and I dont think the difference in strength req. would be huge,
if the difference exists at all:

#1 penalty starts at 9
#2 neg. x after 2-level overcalls start at 8

So basically, opener has always the option to convert, and should do this opening hands, that are not ashamed
of making the opening bid, or with extreme distribution.
So the requirement of 4 spades for being allowed to make, would be an addon, making the bid less frequent.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users