Posted 2017-January-07, 17:10
The way I was taught RKCB the convention was fairly simple: when the response showed a split possibility of Aces, then the higher option of the split promised enough for slam. In other words, you do not go bidding 4N RKCB if 3 key cards is insufficient.
Even then it was problematic, for example if Clubs are trumps and you are not playing kickback or something like that, so 4N was RCKB in clubs (which is what GIB plays) and responder to RKCB has to bid 5C with 0 or 3, knowing that 0 is not sufficient but 3 is sufficient for slam and yet 5C is non-forcing.
But problems like that aside, we should not be adding to the problems unnecessarily.
So on this hand I sympathise with Lycier. I still think that 4S is the wrong bid, but that aside, North should bid again over 5S.
The only argument for passing is where 0 Key cards is impossible AND North is aware that South must be in no doubt that 0 Key cards is impossible.
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. m
s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq