"Old Bridge" vs "New Bridge"
#1
Posted 2015-October-21, 12:43
#2
Posted 2015-October-21, 15:35
monami1027, on 2015-October-21, 12:43, said:
Depends on where you are located. Different local gurus might have different opinions on what's old and new
#3
Posted 2015-October-21, 15:59
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
#4
Posted 2015-October-21, 16:09
- 4 card majors
- 16-18 opening range of 1NT (and no Jacoby transfers)
- Strong opening two-bids
- Preempts consistently on 7-card or longer suits headed by at least three honors
etc.
If you ever venture over to pogo, you'll no doubt find most of the inhabitants playing this "old bridge".
"New bridge," on the other hand, as I understand it, features things like Gazzilli, Bart, Kaplan inversion, Walsh........ none of which I even play. My bidding preferences have tended to land right around the middle in between these.
#5
Posted 2015-October-21, 16:25
#6
Posted 2015-October-21, 19:28
RMB1, on 2015-October-21, 15:59, said:
right cuz no one was cheating back in the day. LOL.
#7
Posted 2015-October-21, 19:29
monami1027, on 2015-October-21, 12:43, said:
At expert levels I would say far more competitive bidding.
#9
Posted 2015-October-22, 04:49
It could mean all kind of things so you will have to ask them. Maybe old bridge is rubber bridge? Or some old-fashioned bidding style? Who knows.
#10
Posted 2015-October-22, 19:08
rhm, on 2015-October-22, 04:24, said:
Rainer Herrmann
That's exactly what I meant you stupid semantic troll.
#11
Posted 2015-October-23, 01:31
PhantomSac, on 2015-October-21, 19:28, said:
PhantomSac, on 2015-October-22, 19:08, said:
My comment was "tounge in cheek" and not meant to be taken seriously and you are not above making such comments yourself as the the quote above shows.
That's no reason to call someone a stupid troll
Rainer Herrmann
#12
Posted 2015-October-23, 04:29
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#13
Posted 2015-October-23, 12:54
#14
Posted 2015-October-23, 13:48
PhantomSac, on 2015-October-21, 19:28, said:
There was a different threshold way back then.
"Bridge Master: The Best of Edgar Kaplan" had some of his articles from the '50s (?) advocating scientific bidding. If I recall correctly, there was some mention of tacit agreement among experts that how you raised partner or doubled held some implications about what you held.
Old is remembering when people looked at you askew if you alerted a 1 NT response to a major as forcing, inverted minors, and new minor bids after a 1 NT rebid as a checkback.
Older is when people were shocked that 2 ♦, 2 ♥, and 2 ♠ openers were preemptive not strong and forcing. Bidding boxes, transfers -- what are they?
Ancient is remembering when you dressed up in suits/jackets and ties for the Sunday team game in tournaments. And the team game was always BAM.
#15
Posted 2015-October-24, 20:55
Light initial actions, adjusting heavier 2N invitations.
Doubles showing at least two place to play.
Use of power doubles (Cooperative penalty/takeout) at or above 2♠
2N and 4N as two places to play.
Psyching 1NT playing 15-17...
Multi
Slam Methods:
4♣ Mulberry / or whatever Eric R wants to call it...
Serious/Frivolous 3N
Last Train
Use of sims to further strategy and identify unseen opportunities.
At the heart of New Bridge is focused innovation with results focus.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese