BBO Discussion Forums: Unusual problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Unusual problem

Poll: Unusual problem (7 member(s) have cast votes)

What's happening?

  1. 2C was checkbacky, 3C was a signoff (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2C was checkbacky, 3C was constructive NF (1 votes [14.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  3. 2C was checkbacky, 3C was GF (5 votes [71.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 71.43%

  4. 2C was nat having Canaped (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 2C was nat, with equal or better spades (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Other (1 votes [14.29%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-August-28, 14:16

You're playing on BBO with a random partner who rates himself as World Class, and everything you've seen so far suggests it's not an exaggeration. Your entire system discussion is 'SAYC, 3041, Standard carding with Lav'.

In those circumstances, how would you (as opener) interpret this auction? (Matchpoints, if that matters)

1 1 /
1N 2 /
2 3
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#2 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2015-August-28, 14:35

4S, 5+ clubs, forcing.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#3 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2015-August-28, 14:44

It's impossible to answer without knowing whether he thinks he are a fish or a shark. How have you played so far?
0

#4 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2015-August-29, 10:43

Entirely too easy to begin with 2c and bid spades later with 5+ clubs and 4 spades and gf. This sequence is much more likely some kind of game force with a problem in clubs for NT purposes. Something like KQxx Axx KQxx xx. Even if one hates the idea of bypassing spades stating with 1s and rebidding 3c over 1n will also work well to show a GF (though in this case there should be some slam interest).
0

#5 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,024
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2015-August-29, 10:55

View Postkenrexford, on 2015-August-28, 14:35, said:

4S, 5+ clubs, forcing.

not if he knows how to bid
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#6 User is offline   Jinksy 

  • Experimental biddicist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 2010-January-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-August-29, 11:52

View PostPhilKing, on 2015-August-28, 14:44, said:

It's impossible to answer without knowing whether he thinks he are a fish or a shark. How have you played so far?


I hadn't had many chances (that I noticed) to do anything colossally brilliant or stupid. I think I'd bid fairly solidly, but we'd only had 2 or 3 hands, and he'd been declarer on 50+% of them (don't think hogging).
The "4 is a transfer to 4" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
0

#7 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2015-August-29, 13:14

View Postmikeh, on 2015-August-29, 10:55, said:

not if he knows how to bid

That's how I have always bid it. With 55, gf, I would have jumped to 3C rather than 2C. With weaker, longer clubs, I would have bid 2NT rather than 2C. With 5S and 4C, I wouldn't care to introduce clubs.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users