BBO Discussion Forums: DONT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

DONT

#1 User is offline   jerdonald 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 124
  • Joined: 2011-July-27

Posted 2015-June-05, 21:51

BBO forum,

When using "DONT" and partner bids a convenient suit asking for your
other suit does partner's bid have to be alerted?

EX:
S W N E
1N 2C P 2D

Does the 2D bid have to be alerted?

Jerry D.
0

#2 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,113
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2015-June-05, 23:13

Yes in most jurisdictions, since 2 doesn't really promise any substantial number of diamonds. Most such "pass or correct" bids are alertable.
0

#3 User is offline   fluff 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 2013-March-23

Posted 2015-June-06, 12:34

You have to alert 2c and explain, if asked : p promises 5+ clubs and 4+ cards in a higher suit.

When advancer bids 2d, overcaller has to alert and explain, if asked : p is ready
to play in d, h and sp.
0

#4 User is offline   ruleof15 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 45
  • Joined: 2014-December-02

Posted 2015-June-06, 17:18

View PostStephen Tu, on 2015-June-05, 23:13, said:

Yes in most jurisdictions, since 2 doesn't really promise any substantial number of diamonds. Most such "pass or correct" bids are alertable.

2d does promise a suit and the other suit would be one of the majors. I think you got DONT confused with Cappelletti.
0

#5 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,341
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2015-June-06, 17:32

View Postruleof15, on 2015-June-06, 17:18, said:

2d does promise a suit and the other suit would be one of the majors. I think you got DONT confused with Cappelletti.

No. It was not about a 2 ovecall, it was about a 2 response to a 2 overcall. The 2 bid showed clubs and another. 2 is nonforcing relay, asking for overcaller's second suit. It will usually be based on three or more diamonds but (54)22 with a weak 5-card suit is certainly possible.

I can't believe there are any jurisdictions in which such a bid is not alertable.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#6 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,829
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2015-June-06, 17:40

View Postfluff, on 2015-June-06, 12:34, said:

You have to alert 2c and explain, if asked : p promises 5+ clubs and 4+ cards in a higher suit.

When advancer bids 2d, overcaller has to alert and explain, if asked : p is ready
to play in d, h and sp.

Alert, yes. Those explanations only apply if that's his partnership agreement.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#7 User is offline   fluff 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 2013-March-23

Posted 2015-June-07, 06:34

Read Bergen for exact explanations on that sequence.
0

#8 User is offline   petterb 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 86
  • Joined: 2009-March-04

Posted 2015-June-07, 07:48

View Postfluff, on 2015-June-07, 06:34, said:

Read Bergen for exact explanations on that sequence.

2 does not promise 5+ clubs.
0

#9 User is offline   fluff 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 2013-March-23

Posted 2015-June-07, 08:12

To make it esier on partner, i think to promise 5+ in 1rst suit is more efficient.

If you can have 4-5 either way, partner has an insoluble problem, like those people who Michael with 5-4. Their partner having to guess with 3-3 will end up in 4-3 fit instead of 5-3.

Now in balance, you can have 4-4.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users