BBO Discussion Forums: 〖叫牌体系〗你愿意如何定义这些竟叫叫品的含义? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

〖叫牌体系〗你愿意如何定义这些竟叫叫品的含义?

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2012-October-26, 04:39



很简单,假如南家同伴争叫的叫品依次是:

2

3

4

5

6

愿意如何定义这些竟叫叫品含义?
0

#2 User is offline   sungh 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 2012-June-29
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:四川省阿坝州

Posted 2012-October-26, 05:03

我来答一下,不知道正确否:
2=5张以上;邀叫
3=哈代加叫之低一级花色的跳加叫,隐匿性是斯普林特
4=哈代加叫之瑞士反加叫
5=方块独立套,高度描述性,
6=同上;
正确的判断来自经验,而经验常常来自错误的判断。

寻找自己的错误才是学习桥牌的唯一进步方法
Posted Image
0

#3 User is offline   601821297 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 493
  • Joined: 2012-July-01

Posted 2012-October-26, 05:21

我来试试
2D=自由叫品,邀叫实力5张以上D
3D=低一级的限制性加叫,隐蔽的斯普林特,9~12大牌点,4张将牌支持
4D=颠倒瑞士加叫,12~15大牌点,4张较差的将牌支持
5D=排除关键张问叫
6D=D+H双套示选

0

#4 User is offline   yzdhy668 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 235
  • Joined: 2012-August-01

Posted 2012-October-26, 22:54

我认为2D比较明确表示 邀请牌力5张+套;
3D需要约定,3D可以表示阻击(也可是D套+H支持需约定),因加叫H可用2S或3S表示

4D可理解为以H为将的SLT
5D是H为将将的排除问叫我赞成
6D应表示要打
0

#5 User is offline   lipeng2076 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 180
  • Joined: 2012-September-11

Posted 2012-October-27, 17:39

前面的怎与格格都一致,只是最后的6d,我理解为大满贯邀请叫,有一d顶张或者额外缺门控制就叫7h,没有就叫回6h。持牌类似为:HAx x x x xx DKQJT32 S-- C--。这牌不适合排除关键张问叫。您认为呢?
0

#6 User is offline   dvd 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 624
  • Joined: 2013-April-15

Posted 2013-August-29, 23:07

2d,强自由逼叫一轮;
3d,hardy隐蔽splinter;
4d,d6h4的配合显示叫;
5d,缺门rkc(d套总是2d起步);
6d,和5楼一致。
0

#7 User is offline   wuhuan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 2012-October-12

Posted 2013-September-01, 01:07

5D定为排除关键张问好,哪S空门扣叫5S问吗?
6D还是要打好,不然约定叫定的太多了,不好玩。
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users