Please comment freely! I have no idea of best/percentage lead. Will post actual hand in 24 hours
Lead problem Many choices!
#1
Posted 2011-September-01, 16:58
Please comment freely! I have no idea of best/percentage lead. Will post actual hand in 24 hours
#2
Posted 2011-September-01, 18:06
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#3
Posted 2011-September-01, 18:41
He will expect a ♥ lead unless I have another safe attacking lead to offer.
I lead the ♥ Ace after fingering the ♦ Jack. Now I can safely blame partner if it makes
#4
Posted 2011-September-02, 09:51
#5
Posted 2011-September-02, 10:11
JLOGIC, on 2011-September-02, 09:51, said:
Would the ten spot be a better signal to partner, or should a low heart work just as well?
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#6
Posted 2011-September-02, 10:26
BunnyGo, on 2011-September-02, 10:11, said:
Heh, I'm sure I'd lead the HA at the table, but I remember a hand where Joel (Wooldridge) did something similar, and he also led suit preference so his partner knew what to shift to...
I think the ten is too dangerous though of getting ducked or something. Maybe that is just paranoia, but in general I like to just lead my normal count card and let partner figure out why I did it.
#7
Posted 2011-September-02, 13:26
#8
Posted 2011-September-04, 22:05
The actual hand below: With over 50% going for the wrong lead, Maybe this is an allocate the blame problem? Perhaps East should have bid 3S or 3C instead of 4H?
#9
Posted 2011-September-05, 00:20
Crunch3nt, on 2011-September-04, 22:05, said:
Maybe this is an allocate the blame problem? Perhaps East should have bid 3S or 3C instead of 4H?
I dont know what others think but imo yes, East should have made his intentions clear for pd before he bid 4♥. If not for lead purpose but for other reasons, look at vulnerability, when you jump to 4♥ white and they bid 4♠, there is always a danger that pd may save.
I think he wanted to ambush opponents and wanted them to bid 4♠ and DBL. Oh well, he got what he wished for. Had he bid normally we could have get a +420 or +200, now if i was his pd we get -790
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#10
Posted 2011-September-05, 02:17
#11
Posted 2011-September-05, 02:26
#12
Posted 2011-September-05, 04:13
gnasher, on 2011-September-05, 02:26, said:
IF we agree on actual hand is a 3♠ bid, he probably have ♠s now. Something like this, u can add 1 more ♥ and take out a ♦ or ♣ from his hand i think, i just wrote pretty fast. There maybe some other hands where opponents screwed up even worse with a genius responder supporting his pd with Hx or something. I cant think of other options when we agree that good hands start with cue. Unless this DBL by agreement tells us not to lead ♥.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#13
Posted 2011-September-05, 04:28
gnasher, on 2011-September-05, 02:26, said:
Either a preemptive raise with 5+♥ or some mixed raise which wants to Dbl 4♠ for penalties
#14
Posted 2011-September-05, 09:17
#15
Posted 2011-September-06, 20:30
ie a similar concept to when the auction goes (1S) X (Pass), 4H shows a distributional hand, and hyou have to go via 2S with bal HCP and hearts?
#16
Posted 2011-September-06, 21:41