BBO Discussion Forums: What now? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What now?

#1 User is offline   Hilver 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 128
  • Joined: 2006-October-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Besides bridge, cycling and reading

Posted 2011-June-06, 08:54

Playing a Big Club (Precision style)You hold:
K Q 7 5 3
9 7 4
J 9 2
10 4

Your partner opens 1, Your RHO bids 1, You bid 1 (= 5/6-card , 5-8 HCP).
LHO passess, and partner rebids 2(= GF). RHO passess and You bid 2. LHO passes again and now partner bids 3(= denying any 5+-suit).

So the bidding:
1 - (1) - 1 - (pass)
2 - (pass) - 2 - (pass)
3 - (pass) - ?
What do You respond now?

Thx
Jan
0

#2 User is offline   the_clown 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 645
  • Joined: 2010-December-02

Posted 2011-June-06, 10:53

I am bidding 3, I do not see any alternative. If I bid 3NT, the contract will be most likely wrongsided, (besides I only have a half stop in their suit), 3 would show either 4card suit or Hxx. If P bids 3NT i pass, if he makes a cuebid I will bid 4.
0

#3 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2011-June-06, 11:19

View PostHilver, on 2011-June-06, 08:54, said:

and now partner bids 3(= denying any 5+-suit).


Uhhuh, and what would 2NT have shown?
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#4 User is online   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,420
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2011-June-06, 12:22

So, has he categorically denied spade support? He's had two chances, although the first one reasonably wants to set the game force before showing suits (not sure I like it if I can't make a descriptive bid because I *have to* set the GF, though), the second one, if it's just denying a 5-card round suit, doesn't help.

Assuming that he has denied three spades, you're kind of stuck. Provided that you have another initial call for KQTxxxx, I guess 3 is least bad - partner's going to take you for 6, but you have no diamond stopper (and don't really want to be declarer in NT anyway) and the 5-2 is probably better in your suit than the 4-3 heart fit.

This is the reason I play "p/xx NGF, systems on" after 1-(1) - not that it's going to be any better, except that 1-(1)-1 (showing spades) sets the game force, so we are one call ahead of you.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#5 User is offline   Hilver 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 128
  • Joined: 2006-October-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Besides bridge, cycling and reading

Posted 2011-June-06, 13:55

View Postmgoetze, on 2011-June-06, 11:19, said:

Uhhuh, and what would 2NT have shown?


2NT would have meant 22+ HP, balanced; not more then 2 spades.
-1

#6 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2011-June-06, 18:37

View PostHilver, on 2011-June-06, 13:55, said:

2NT would have meant 22+ HP, balanced; not more then 2 spades.


So 3 shows (a) exactly 20-21 balanced or (b) exactly 1444 shape? Then logically we should be playing 3 = transfer to 3NT and 3 = transfer to 4 hearts. I bid the transfer to 3NT.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#7 User is offline   jmcw 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 662
  • Joined: 2008-October-15

Posted 2011-June-06, 21:29

Partner wants to know more about your hand, and I don't think he's fishing for a second suit.
Most likely he has a fit (he should have set trumps earlier), or possibly a big balanced hand(can 2NT be 25+)

With no control to show, I would just bid 3 or if the fit is "guaranteed" I can see bidding 4
0

#8 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,696
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2011-June-07, 04:18

Is the auction not smoother if I rebid 2NT? This presumablly shows "something" in diamonds but should not need to show a full stop. Now if partner comes back with 3D I can bid 3S having shown exactly 5 spades and a half-stop in diamonds - seems a reasonable description, no?
(-: Zel :-)
0

#9 User is offline   shevek 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 707
  • Joined: 2006-September-29
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:whippets<br>anarchy<br>relay

Posted 2011-June-09, 05:38

3, having denied 4.
This allows me to bid 3NT over partner's 3 to show my Jxx or partner to bid a delayed 3NT instead with his Qx.
1

#10 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-June-11, 19:23

Yeah 3H seems obvious. We cannot bid spades a 3rd time on 5332.
0

#11 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2011-June-12, 04:54

I think that maybe 3 should already promise some half stopper. If he has completely empty diamonds he should've preffered raising spades with two of them, I mean he may have AKQ and AKQ in round suits but it's still not enough for GF so with Hx of spades he could've raised and with Qx(x)/Txxx of diamonds he would bid 3. I am bidding 3NT as I don't want partner to visualize Kxxxx KQx xx xxx and going for heart game.
0

#12 User is offline   Hilver 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 128
  • Joined: 2006-October-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Netherlands
  • Interests:Besides bridge, cycling and reading

Posted 2011-June-14, 12:48

View Postbluecalm, on 2011-June-12, 04:54, said:

I think that maybe 3 should already promise some half stopper. If he has completely empty diamonds he should've preffered raising spades with two of them, I mean he may have AKQ and AKQ in round suits but it's still not enough for GF so with Hx of spades he could've raised and with Qx(x)/Txxx of diamonds he would bid 3. I am bidding 3NT as I don't want partner to visualize Kxxxx KQx xx xxx and going for heart game.


Openers hand:
A x x
A K 10 9
A 10 x
A K Q
-1

#13 User is offline   dcohio 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 2009-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-June-15, 21:53

Partner already GF with 2, the 3 bid should be stopper seeking. Having extras and a fit in your suit (that you bid twice) I see no reason for the 3 call... 3 should show his hand nicely here. If you have a max you'll cue.
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users