BBO Discussion Forums: Crazy or Genius? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Crazy or Genius?

#1 User is offline   dcohio 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 2009-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-December-08, 23:08

Is south a genius or insane?


0

#2 User is offline   rduran1216 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 815
  • Joined: 2009-August-31

Posted 2010-December-09, 00:46

He's a cheater who should be banned.
Aaron Jones Unit 557

www.longbeachbridge.com
0

#3 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-December-09, 02:22

View Postrduran1216, on 2010-December-09, 00:46, said:

He's a cheater who should be banned.

Let me guess, you are new to the game and never heard of the advantages of Canapé bidding.

South is very strong and he does not need much from partner to make game or slam.
Obviously it is better to play a fit, since the suit is a great source of tricks.
Bidding 5 is save, because if partner is short (which is unlikely since opener usually won't have a 4 card side suit) , opps will probably dbl and you can escape to .
On the other hand partner is unlikely to support a bid, even if he is strong enough, because he can't know that we have 8 cards there.
0

#4 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-December-09, 02:40

He gave the canapé overcall a try (but why did he only bid 5?) and it worked, yet again...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#5 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2010-December-09, 03:00

What is this talk of canapé? Presumably his 3 bid showed + a minor, and then 5 showed his minor. It wouldn't be my choice to bid this hand that way, but it doesn't demonstrate anything sinister.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#6 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2010-December-09, 06:21

View Postgordontd, on 2010-December-09, 03:00, said:

What is this talk of canapé? Presumably his 3 bid showed + a minor, and then 5 showed his minor. It wouldn't be my choice to bid this hand that way, but it doesn't demonstrate anything sinister.

To bad he doesn't know how to play Leaping Michaels properly and he wouldn't be accused of cheating.
4D! = Hts + Diam, big hand; whereas
3S! = asks for a Sp-stop for 3NT.

Then again, this isn't your classic 2-suiter.
Maybe he was asking for a stop.
Then again, maybe 5D was a misclick and he meant to bid 5H.
Then again, maybe he heard of the Spingold Coup.
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#7 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2010-December-09, 08:41

So, what was 3? If it shows a two-suiter (hearts-minor) I'd say he was lucky. If it shows only a strong hand then it could be cheating. If it shows hearts, then it's a great understanding

There's a thin line between crazy and genius...

View Postwyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


View Postrbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#8 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2010-December-09, 08:57

View PostTWO4BRIDGE, on 2010-December-09, 06:21, said:

To bad he doesn't know how to play Leaping Michaels properly and he wouldn't be accused of cheating.

Too bad people don't weigh up the evidence before jumping to conclusions - then he wouldn't be accused of cheating.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#9 User is offline   dcohio 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 218
  • Joined: 2009-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-December-09, 09:09

View PostHanoi5, on 2010-December-09, 08:41, said:

So, what was 3? If it shows a two-suiter (hearts-minor) I'd say he was lucky. If it shows only a strong hand then it could be cheating. If it shows hearts, then it's a great understanding

There's a thin line between crazy and genius...


My partner doesn't play leaping or western cue, and this was my hand.

3 was inquired by LHO, and partner correctly described our agreement as hearts and an undisclosed minor. We use 3NT to play, 4NT for minors.

I figured 5 or 5 had a good chance if partner had any support for either, and I wanted to get them to the 5 level if I could. I also figured that 5 was safe as me or partner could pull to 5 in case of disaster. Imagine my shock when partner raises to 6, then tables a near perfect dummy.
0

#10 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2010-December-09, 09:11

6 always makes.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#11 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,625
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-December-09, 09:52

If 3 was michaels, then it seems clear to bid 4NT if you want to bid a second time (and keep diamonds in the picture). Partner is not going to correct to hearts with 2-3 in the reds. After all, why can't you have 5 hearts and 6 diamonds.
Wayne Somerville
0

#12 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2010-December-09, 10:25

View Postdcohio, on 2010-December-08, 23:08, said:

Is south a genius or insane?
Agree with Manudude03. IMO: 5 = 10, 4N = 8, 5 = 2. Over 4...
  • _X = Extra power but only 5-5 shape.
  • 4N = Extra shape. e.g 66. If shape is 65 or 75 or 76, then are better.
  • 5 = Extra shape. This minor is longer/better than .
  • 5 = Ditto.
  • 5 = Extra shape. Great . Lousy minor.
On this deal, if you bid, then you are likely to land on your feet. For example, over 5 partner can bid 5N to ask for the minor.
0

#13 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2010-December-09, 10:54

Please not this again.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
1

#14 User is offline   rduran1216 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 815
  • Joined: 2009-August-31

Posted 2010-December-09, 10:55

View PosthotShot, on 2010-December-09, 02:22, said:

Let me guess, you are new to the game and never heard of the advantages of Canapé bidding.

South is very strong and he does not need much from partner to make game or slam.
Obviously it is better to play a fit, since the suit is a great source of tricks.
Bidding 5 is save, because if partner is short (which is unlikely since opener usually won't have a 4 card side suit) , opps will probably dbl and you can escape to .
On the other hand partner is unlikely to support a bid, even if he is strong enough, because he can't know that we have 8 cards there.


if 3S is really hearts + minor, why would you ever conceal an 8 card suit for a 4 card suit. Canape has nothing to do with anything. Partner with 1 heart and 3 diamonds is not correcting to 5H, and idk what good player would dbl with the West hand, knowing they'll run to Hearts.

Doubling 5D is an amateur move, bidding 5D and covering up a strong 8 card suit is just ridiculous. If this wasn't cheating, then it was an absolutely bonkers bid.
Aaron Jones Unit 557

www.longbeachbridge.com
0

#15 User is offline   kayin801 

  • Modern Day Trebuchet Enthusiast
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 738
  • Joined: 2007-October-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Western Mass.

Posted 2010-December-09, 11:24

I don't mind 3, you don't want partner to pass your X if he has spades, a leaping michaels call distorts your shape, and a heart bid risks burying the diamond suit and/or not getting high enough. With OP's bidding agreement this is still a distortion, and it would be nice if 4NT showed this kind of hand (correcting clubs to diamonds) as was suggested above. If 4NT doesn't show this hand then South has a huge problem over 4, and 5 is the 2nd best solution and slightly crazy (I prefer 5)

Suggesting that this is cheating is hilarious, sometimes when I open at the 1 level my partner has 7 card support, does that make it cheating? EDIT: not to mention we've already shown hearts, and showing our diamonds is also a descriptive bid, even if it is the wrong one.
I once yelled at my partner for discarding the 'wrong' card when he was subjected to a squeeze that I allowed by giving the wrong count with too high a card. Now he's allowed to pitch aces when the opponents have the king in the dummy. At trick 2. When he could have followed suit. And blame me.

East4Evil sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users