BBO Discussion Forums: Trying for a full house - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Trying for a full house team effort required!

Poll: Your action, dealer at favourable (32 member(s) have cast votes)

Your action, dealer at favourable

  1. pass (1 votes [3.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.12%

  2. 1S (25 votes [78.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 78.12%

  3. 2D multi (1 votes [3.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.12%

  4. 2S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 3S (5 votes [15.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.62%

  6. 4S (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. no other (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   shevek 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 707
  • Joined: 2006-September-29
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:whippets<br>anarchy<br>relay

Posted 2009-January-30, 21:42

Scoring: IMP

You deal and ...

0

#2 User is offline   JLOL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 2008-December-05

Posted 2009-January-30, 21:45

1S seems obvious at this vul, wouldn't mind 2 if red/white.
0

#3 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-January-30, 22:22

1 for me.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#4 User is offline   JLOL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 2008-December-05

Posted 2009-January-30, 22:58

Also I wish the D5 or S5 was an 8 then you would have 1 of every card.
0

#5 User is offline   mikestar 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 913
  • Joined: 2003-August-18
  • Location:California, USA

Posted 2009-January-30, 23:16

I don't care to preempt with this one--too much chance that some random club holding in partner's hand can promote my Q to a second defensive trick. Trading the T for a small spade could tip my decision the other way--it's that close IMO, in which case I'd try 3. No way will I open a seven carder with a weak two at these colors.
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-January-31, 02:36

I would never open this 2, I like 1 best, then 3 and then 4.
0

#7 User is offline   maggieb 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 339
  • Joined: 2008-October-15
  • Interests:Sewing, Cooking, and Square Dancing!

Posted 2009-January-31, 05:11

1 by a mile.
If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion. :)
0

#8 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-January-31, 06:36

I play 2 as 8-11 with a 6-bagger. I'd not allow an extra spade at any colours when I'm in the upper range.

So I open 1.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#9 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-January-31, 07:12

wow apparently there's only a .01% chance of that happening (one of each card)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#10 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-January-31, 14:57

gwnn, on Jan 31 2009, 08:12 AM, said:

wow apparently there's only a .01% chance of that happening (one of each card)

Wow really that much?

(52/52)*(48/51)*(44/50)*(40/49)*(36/48)*(32/47)*(28/46)*(24/45)*(20/44)*(16/43)*(12/42)*(8/41)*(4/40) = .00010568

I guess so. Surprised it's not smaller!
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#11 User is offline   JLOL 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,033
  • Joined: 2008-December-05

Posted 2009-January-31, 15:00

I have only noticed it twice but have probably had it much more if it is .01%
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users