Huh?
#1
Posted 2008-November-06, 22:44
As dealer, you hold ♠AJxxx ♥x ♦KJx ♣A9xx
1♠-X-P-2♦
P-2♥-P-3♣
P-P-3♥-P
?
-P.J. Painter.
#2
Posted 2008-November-06, 22:50
- hrothgar
#4
Posted 2008-November-06, 23:52
1S X p 2D
p 2H p 3C
p p 3H p
So,
Partner passed after 1S X, then didnt bid over 2H either.
LHO has doubled and bid hearts, showing a strong hand with hearts
RHO has bid a new suit and made a forcing bid opposite partner's strong hand
LHO has passed RHOs forcing bid
Partner has reopened with 3H?
#5
Posted 2008-November-07, 00:22
#6
Posted 2008-November-07, 00:50
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2008-November-07, 06:54
I pass.
Of course, it's also possible that partner is being a bit irrational.
"gwnn" said:
hanp does not always mean literally what he writes.
#9
Posted 2008-November-07, 07:15
rogerclee, on Nov 7 2008, 12:52 AM, said:
1S X p 2D
p 2H p 3C
p p 3H p
So,
Partner passed after 1S X, then didnt bid over 2H either.
LHO has doubled and bid hearts, showing a strong hand with hearts
RHO has bid a new suit and made a forcing bid opposite partner's strong hand
LHO has passed RHOs forcing bid
Partner has reopened with 3H?
Yes. This was the actual auction. No alerts. Everyone playing normal systems and normal stuff. I opened 1♠ and heard this unfold.
-P.J. Painter.
#10
Posted 2008-November-07, 07:19
Any other explanation would be even more absurd.
#11
Posted 2008-November-07, 07:37
-P.J. Painter.
#12
Posted 2008-November-07, 09:10
rogerclee, on Nov 7 2008, 12:52 AM, said:
RHO has bid a new suit and made a forcing bid opposite partner's strong hand
I susepect they play that 2♥ says '♥+♣ or strong with ♥', and 3♣ says 'If you have the former, I wish to play in 3♣'.
It seems reasonable to me as an ELC variant.
#13
Posted 2008-November-07, 12:32
#14
Posted 2008-November-07, 13:22
kenrexford, on Nov 7 2008, 08:15 AM, said:
I disagree.
Anyway, if my partner really does this at the table and the director makes me finish the hand, I bid 3♠.
#15
Posted 2008-November-07, 14:59
jdonn, on Nov 7 2008, 02:22 PM, said:
kenrexford, on Nov 7 2008, 08:15 AM, said:
I disagree.
Anyway, if my partner really does this at the table and the director makes me finish the hand, I bid 3♠.
Well, true. LOL I suppose "normal stuff for local club games" is a better description of what was apparently going on.
I ended up bidding 3NT, because that contract makes more tricks than it should more often than any other contract.
The play was cool. I got a strange lead of the spade King, ducked. LHO thought for a minute and then switched to a diamond-9-10-K. I then stole a heart trick with the Jack. So far, so good. Clear the diamond: small-small-Jack-club. Diamond to RHO's Ace, LHO showing out and ditching another club.
This is getting somewhat interesting, anyway. RHO returned to spades, ducked by both me and my LHO. I won the second one, as I figured that LHO held 5-4-1-3 shape and would now drop his J or 10 of clubs. When I sent a club toward dummy, he played the Jack, won in dummy. When I cashed the remaining diamond (ditching a spade) and played a club, LHO rose with the 10, ducked. He cashed the 13th diamond (pitch another spade) and had to lead away from his Qx of clubs into my A9, for down one. 4♥ had gone down one at the two tables reporting at this point.
So, as you can see now, the sick layout was:
Yep. Probably a very common sequence...
-P.J. Painter.